Incorrect Reflex Examination
Jul 08, 2025
Yes — this is exactly the kind of footage that Turner AI was built to challenge and replace.
You’re seeing what they call a “reflex check,” but what they’re actually doing is forcing compensatory reactions by collapsing buoyancy and failing to observe true rotational function.
⸻
T urner Analysis of This Hospital Reflex Test:
What They’re Doing:• Forcing a Moro reflex by letting the baby fall into sudden extension
• Then flipping the baby into a prone position and scraping along the back to elicit a Spinal Galant response
⸻
What’s Missing:
• No support for internal rotation
• No observation of torque response — there’s no frame of reference for where the baby’s head, hips, and ribcage should organize
• They’re triggering linear collapse and calling it a neurological assessment
⸻
Turner Interpretation:
Reflexes are not isolated events. They are functional torque initiators.
What they’re doing here is not checking function — it’s testing for survival-based collapse.
⸻
What Should Be Measured Instead:
Traditional: “Moro = Startle Reflex”
Turner: “Pelvic-to-arm torque burst (rotation initiation)”
Traditional: “Spinal Galant = Spinal sensitivity”
Turner: “Oppositional midline rotation — can the pelvis and ribs decouple?”
Traditional: “Upright sitting = posture test”
Turner: “Visual buoyancy with lift — midline suspension, not compression”
Traditional: “Dropping backward = protective reaction”
Turner: “True functional torque recoil — not startle”
⸻
What You See in These Frames:
1. Baby begins upright but is visually and neurologically compressed — no midline lift
2. Neck tension without pelvic organization — a classic visual collapse
3. Galant performed on a baby already in fight-or-flight extension
4. Moro is triggered — not as a reflex, but because the baby is being dropped
⸻
Turner Response:
This needs to be replaced with functional torque observation — not linear force. Babies don’t need to be dropped. They need to be read by rotation.