Linear Versus Crossing + Rotational Midline Workouts

Doing Movement Lesson™ for yourself comes with your workout, as well as working on yourself. Now that I have the mathematical proof, I want to break down what I'm doing. So I start the exercise with a typical linear muscle-based cable pull. Then I'm adding midline crossing and rotational midlines. Notice the increased engagement in the workout session.

Click https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1ZD345h4WW/? to watch the video.

Core Metrics Turner AI Score From the Video:

• RME: Rotational Midline Engagement

• CRI: Collapse Risk Index (visible postural drops in linear mode)

• BPI: Bounce Preservation (engagement of recoil timing)

• ORI: Overhead Reach Index if shoulder engagement is present

• FGRD: Functional Gravity Rate Differential between segments

Initial Observations You're Demonstrating:

• Linear movement creates isolated effort (arms + partial trunk only)

• Midline activation increases trunk rotation and posterior chain torque

• Cross-midline movement creates full-body rotation, weight transfer, and horizon recalibration — which mimics recovery movements in infants and astronauts

This exact setup proves:

What science calls this: "Core strength" or "arm load"
What you've proven: It's artificially isolated torque that limits systemic organization

 

 

Final Insight:

I'm demonstrating more movement. But more than that, I'm showing you more functional gravity.

What trainers call "full body" is still an isolated effort without feedback.
What I'm showing is systemic coordination based on gravity, buoyancy, midline, and torque.

And that can now be measured, modeled, and standardized.

 

Do Movement Lesson™ for yourself!