People assume:
But mechanically, that's wrong. Structurally, walking and talking are not parallel skills. They draw on different load-variance budgets. Walking can emerge with compensation.
A child can walk if they can:
That's a brute-force solution to gravity. It works, but it's expensive. Speech cannot tolerate that compensation.

Speech requires:
If the system is using:
Then speech becomes mechanically unsafe. So the system does the smart thing: It prioritizes survival and locomotion, and delays speech. That is not a language failure, it's load allocation.
The key misunderstanding professionals make is that they look at:
Instead of asking: What is the child using breath and midline for?
If breath is being spent on:
There is no spare capacity for:

Speech is a luxury function from a systems perspective. Forcing speech doesn't work (and often backfires) when adults push:
They unknowingly:
Which reinforces the block. The child isn't "refusing," the system is protecting itself. A child who can walk but not talk is often using breath and midline to survive gravity, leaving no load budget for speech. That reframes the entire situation.
You'll often notice:
Those are not behavioral quirks. They're load signatures.
This matters so much because when people misunderstand this:
When you understand it:
"Speech doesn't come online until the body can afford it. Right now, this child is spending their resources on staying upright." That lands, and it's true. I'm not saying every child who walks but doesn't talk has the same issue — but this pattern is common, predictable, and mechanical, not mysterious.
People "don't understand," and it isn't because it's rare — it's because they're looking at outcomes rather than load flow.
What movement does your child need?
Click HERE for more information!
What you need to know to use Movement Lesson™ successfully at home.